Is the A poll really relevant? Springfield has over half the votes when they have 3 losses in the icshl central league which is way worse the then icshl south league..wc east,henderson, and kennett are way better then springfield...who do you guys believe that should be ranked 1st?
okay that is good, i thought it might have something to do with it...but it is probably just that springfield has the most followers or many people that have played against them voted for them
Yeah, Springfield is absolutely horrendous. So is the Central Division - always has been. Don't think any of their teams have even sniffed a Flyers Cup victory.
Anyway...my pics are below. The #1's this year are unbelievably obvious.
Of course the level of competition matters, that's the whole point of the having the seeding committee. If it went strictly by record, teams would load up with patsies on thier schedule to go undefeated and get the #1 seed.
A team can be 15-1, but if they didnt play anyone good.....the record alone isnt getting them the #1 seed.
Posts: 959 | Location: Philly | Registered: 11 September 2006
I wouldn't call Springfield horrendous. From what I saw they looked pretty good, just not as good as Kennett. And wasn't the Flyers Cup Championship between two Central Division teams last year? Springfield and Penncrest.
This message has been edited. Last edited by: Hockey,
CoachK was being sarcastic....he's like that sometimes.
A Central team has won the 'A' Flyers Cup six years in a row. 2006 Penncrest 2005 Penncrest 2004 Radnor 2003 Radnor 2002 Radnor 2001 Springfield 2000 Pennsbury (Lower Bucks)
Posts: 959 | Location: Philly | Registered: 11 September 2006
i dont think the central division is that good..i remember playing penncrest last year and they were good..but at least half maybe more of their team was seniors