cgi.breakawaymonthly.com
Forums
Breakaway! Message Boards
High School Hockey
Defenseman of the Year|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
hockeyisfun. i believe the post was regarding dmen not forwards, so any discussion about moyer,welch and the others is for another time (and i agree with some of your selections). as for your dmen selections i concur with a couple especially wanner who i believe is a wonderful dman. as for your vitriolic comments against lasalle my suggestion would be to simply calm down especially since we are not discussing their moral righteousness but just defensemen.
|
||||
|
I agree with crusader, not only regarding this topic line, but throughout the forum. ALL of these kids are good players. They are a tiny percentage of those who started as mites. The rest are all gone. They quit after squirt, they quit after checking started, after pee wee they got interested in something else, and by bantam they got interested in lacrosse, girls, or simply weren't willing to do the work. We ought to be able to talk about the good qualities of these kids, all of whom have risen to the top tier at their age level, and compare them with their competitors without going negative. You can be a strong advocate for a kid without without dumping on the rest.
|
||||
|
At what point did I dump on other players or "go negative"? Your right crusader, this is a defenseman topic but someone said something about berkle and schmidt. If anything Crusader has gone negative of most who are not in a LaSalle Uniform
|
||||
|
hockeyisfun. i did not go negative and in fact mentioned lightheart and oliveri in my first post as well as agreed with your assessment of wanner. if mcdyre was a high school dman you could add him, but believe np played him at center. in the end even you have to admit that lasalle had several fine dmen who could be listed near the top. if you don't agree then fine, but chill out on the vituperative statements.
|
||||
|
agreed crusader.hockeyisfun: seems that varley won the poll,what are your thoughts on that?
|
||||
|
My thoughts on the poll are that you can have 100 lasalle people vote for Varley because he goes to Lasalle. Is it a coincidence that Lightheart and Oliveri play for the minutemen? Maybe that is why you named them. And for ranger, your obviously a Lasalle player or parent as is crusader. So naturally, your assessment will be that of your own team first.
|
||||
|
that can be true. still who is your number 1 and where would you rank varley?
|
||||
|
McDyre? I don't think he has ever played D any where. What is that about? |
||||
|
wanner
blaker varley hayden laessig lamont mchugh |
||||
|
did you get a chance to see lightheart and oliveri play? wanner is a fine defenseman no arguement there. i guess we will agre to disagree.
|
||||
|
Please Blaker would be there top D man |
||||
|
Thats no surprise coming from you.
|
||||
|
Blaker is not even close to Varley or even Pacel
|
||||
|
Maybe a great way to name the top anyplayer would be to name the players that had the most impact at the level that they played at, A, AA, AAA... How about it Matt, would that be equitable?
|
||||
|
|
Moderator |
My oppinion for "biggest Impact"
AAA Seravalli, Holy Ghost AA A.J. Moyer Pennridge A Lamont, WC East (After he was moved to the Blueline) |
|||
|
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community | Page 1 2 3 |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
cgi.breakawaymonthly.com
Forums
Breakaway! Message Boards
High School Hockey
Defenseman of the Year
